Structure–Activity Relationships of Phenylalkylamines as Agonist Ligands for 5-HT2A Receptors

DOI : 10.1002/cmdc.200800133 Structure–Activity Relationships of Phenylalkylamines as Agonist Ligands for 5-HT 2A Receptors Antoni R. Blaazer,* [a] Pieter Smid, [b] and Chris G. Kruse* [a, b] Introduction Wide-ranging physiological processes are mediated through the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT, 1) system. 5-HT and its receptors are scattered throughout the body. Dysfunction has been implicated in cardiovascular and digestive disorders as w

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 11
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.


Publish on:

Views: 3 | Pages: 11

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

  DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200800133 Structure–Activity Relationships of Phenylalkylamines asAgonist Ligands for 5-HT 2A Receptors Antoni R. Blaazer,* [a] Pieter Smid, [b] and Chris G. Kruse* [a, b] Introduction Wide-ranging physiological processes are mediated throughthe serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT, 1 ) system. 5-HT andits receptors are scattered throughout the body. Dysfunctionhas been implicated in cardiovascular and digestive disordersas well as numerous psychiatric disorders. [1] Pharmacologicalmanipulation of the 5-HT system is believed to have therapeu-tic potential, and therefore the subject of intense research. [2] There are seven distinct families of 5-HT receptors (5-HT 1–7 ),and there is molecular and functional evidence for the exis-tence of at least 14 different mammalian subtypes. [3] With theexception of the 5-HT 3 receptor, a ligand-gated ion channel, all5-HT receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). [3,4] The5-HT 2 receptor family has three known subtypes, 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C , [4,5] with ~ 46–50% sequence identity. [1] Moreover,the transmembrane domains of the 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C recep-tors share 80% sequence identity, suggesting similar pharma-cological profiles. [6] In the central nervous system (CNS), 5-HT 2A receptors are pri-marily found in cortical and forebrain areas, various brainstemnuclei, and the hippocampus. [7] The cellular localization of 5-HT 2A receptors is primarily on the dendrites [8,9] of cortical pyra-midal glutamatergic projection neurons, [10,11] local GABAeric in-terneurons, [12] and on cholinergic neurons. [13–15] A proportion of 5-HT 2A receptors is believed to be located presynaptically on,most probably, monoamine axons. [9] Glial 5-HT 2A receptorshave been identified also. [9,16] Peripherally, the 5-HT 2A receptoris found in platelets, vascular smooth muscle cells, and oculartissue. [17–19] In contrast, the 5-HT 2B receptor is primarily found inthe periphery, such as the rat stomach fundus, and caninelungs and smooth muscles. [3,4,20] Furthermore 5-HT 2B receptorsare found in the hearts of primates and rats. [21] The murine 5-HT 2B receptor is expressed in the stomach, intestine, pulmona-ry smooth muscles, myocardium, and the brain, most notablycerebellar Purkinje cells. [22] Distribution of the 5-HT 2C receptoris primarily limited to the CNS. [1] 5-HT 2C mRNA is broadly dis-tributed throughout numerous brain regions; this receptorsubtype is believed to be the principal 5-HT receptor in thebrain. [23] Physiological Roles and Therapeutic Potentialof 5-HT 2 Receptors Given their distribution pattern, 5-HT 2 receptors have diversephysiological roles. Central 5-HT 2A receptors modulate GABAer-gic and glutamergic neurotransmission. [17] Activation of 5-HT 2A receptors stimulates the secretion of various hormones. [24] 5-HT 2A receptors play a physiological role in working memory, [25] the regulation of cognitive states, and associative learning. [26] Moreover, 5-HT 2A receptors influence neuronal plasticity  Agonist activation of central 5-HT  2A receptors results in diverse ef-fects, such as hallucinations and changes of consciousness.Recent findings indicate that activation of the 5-HT  2A receptor also leads to interesting physiological responses, possibly holdingtherapeutic value. Selective agonists are needed to study the full therapeutic potential of this receptor. 5-HT  2A ligands with agonist  profiles are primarily derived from phenylalkylamines, indolealkyl-amines, and certain piperazines. Of these, phenylalkylamines,most notably substituted phenylisopropylamines, are considered the most selective agonists for 5-HT  2 receptors. This review sum-marizes the structure–activity relationships (SAR) of phenylalkyla-mines as agonist ligands for 5-HT  2A receptors. Selectivity is a cen-tral theme, as is selectivity for the 5-HT  2A receptor and for its spe-cific signaling pathways. SAR data from receptor affinity studies,functional assays, behavioral drug discrimination as well ashuman studies are discussed. [a] A. R. Blaazer, Prof. Dr. C. G. KruseSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Centre for NeuroScience, University of AmsterdamKruislaan 320, 1098 SM Amsterdam (The Netherlands)Fax: (  + 31)610-059-548E-mail:  [b] Dr. P. Smid, Prof. Dr. C. G. KruseSolvay Pharmaceuticals, Research LaboratoriesC. J. van Houtenlaan 36, 1381 CP Weesp (The Netherlands)Fax: (  + 31)294-477-148E-mail: ChemMedChem 2008  , 3, 1299–1309  2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1299  through brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-mediatedprocesses. [27] Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) is regulated by 5-HT 2A receptors. [18,19] Peripheral 5-HT 2A receptors mediate diverse pro-cesses such as vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation. [1,28] 5-HT 2B receptors mediate neural tube morphogenesis in theembryo, [29] and are important in the development of the cardi-ovascular system. [30,31] The 5-HT 2C receptor is involved in di-verse processes such as locomotor activity, anxiogenesis, andneuro-endocrine functions. [17] Moreover, the 5-HT 2C receptorregulates various aspects of feeding and food intake, [32] and isimplicated in sexual dysfunction in males. [33,34] Both 5-HT 2A and5-HT 2B receptors were found to mediate liver regeneration in apartial hepatectomy model. [35] Drugs that target 5-HT 2 receptors are used in the treatmentof various psychiatric disorders, including depression, [36] anxi-ety, [37–39] obsessive-compulsive disorders, [40] and schizophre-nia. [41,42] Many antipsychotic drugs are 5-HT 2A receptor inverseagonists or antagonists. [43,44] Activation of the 5-HT 2A receptorby agonist psilocybin ( 2 ) produces schizophrenia-like psychoticsymptoms in humans, which are significantly reduced by selec-tive 5-HT 2A antagonists. [45] Psychotomimetic effects of halluci-nogenic drugs such as psilocybin ( 2 ), d  -lysergic acid N  , N  -dieth-ylamide (LSD, 3 ), and mescaline ( 4 ) are primarily mediated by5-HT 2A receptors. [46–49] Mystical-type experiences of sustainedpersonal meaning have been reported to result from the useof psilocybin in a controlled setting. [50] Elucidation on howthese experiences arise in the brain could potentially havetherapeutic possibilities. [50] The reduction in IOP by 5-HT 2A ago-nists has recently been recognized as an efficient treatment forocular hypertension and glaucoma. [18,51,52] Agonist activation of 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2B receptors results in liver regeneration, [35] however clinical efficacy in liver regeneration following trans-plantation remains to be demonstrated. [53,54] 5-HT 2B receptorantagonists can be used to treat anxiety disorders, however,their application is limited because of the role this receptorplays in embryogenesis. [17] Drugs targeting both 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C receptors can be used to treat migraines. [42,55] Drugs mod-ulating 5-HT 2C activity are applicable in the treatment of obesi-ty, erectile dysfunction and anxiety disorders. [17,32] 5-HT 2 Receptor Agonist Ligands Ligands for 5-HT 2 receptors belong to structurally diversechemical classes, most notably indolealkylamines, phenylalkyla-mines, arylpiperazines, alkylpiperidines, alkylpiperazines, poly-cyclic/tricyclic agents, among others. [56] 5-HT 2 receptor subtypeligands have been developed. [17,57,58] Agonist activation of 5-HT 2 receptors has been the subject of recent studies, indicatinga growing interest in the therapeutic potential underlying acti-vation of this class of receptors. [18,32,35,36,38,40,50] 5-HT 2 receptoragonists generally show little subtype selectivity, however,some selective agonists have been designed for 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C receptors. [32,59,60] The identification of agonists with 5-HT 2A receptor subtype selectivity lags behind, and the need for theirdevelopment has been acknowledged. [3,4,17] Agonists selectivefor the 5-HT 2A receptor and its associated signaling pathwaysare needed to research the full therapeutic potential of this re-ceptor.5-HT 2A receptor agonists and partial agonists are primarily in-dolealkylamines and phenylalkylamines. [61] Certain piperazineshave also been classified as agonists. [62] Based on their struc-tures, the indolealkylamines can be subdivided into trypta-mines, ergolines and b -carbolines, and he phenylalkylamineclass includes phenethylamines and phenylisopropylamines(amphetamines). Indolealkylamines generally show little sub-type selectivity, binding multiple 5-HT receptor subclasses. [63] The most selective agonists for 5-HT 2 receptor subtypes arefound in the phenylalkylamine class, most notably the substi-tuted phenylisopropylamines. The structure–activity relation-ships (SAR) have been extensively studied generating a vastnumber of phenylalkylamines with 5-HT 2A binding potentialand functional activity. [64–67] The purpose of this review is tosummarize the SAR of the phenylalkylamines as agonist li-gands for the 5-HT 2A receptor, focusing on subtype and func-tion selectivity. Signaling pathways, pharmacological methods,site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies rel-evant for 5-HT 2A receptor research are described. 5-HT 2A Receptor Signaling and FunctionalSelectivity The concepts used in receptor pharmacology are constantly re-vised to fully describe the complexity of GPCR signaling. [68,69] Ligands are believed to induce conformational changes in theGPCR resulting in differential activation of the associated signaltransduction pathways. [70,71] Moreover, cellular conditions arerecognized as an important factor in determining drug action,and the classical concept of “intrinsic efficacy” is no longersupported. [72] Detailed knowledge of downstream signalingpathways coupled to 5-HT 2A receptors is needed to study thefunctional activity of these ligands. As a pleiotropic GPCR, the5-HT 2A receptor can couple to different G proteins, and has theability to show a broad array of responses, such as internaliza-tion and desensitization. [73,74] The ligand-induced differentialactivation of downstream signaling pathways has been givenvarious names, such as “agonist-directed trafficking of receptorstimulus”, “protean agonism” and “ligand-biased effica-cy”; [70,71,75,76] however, it has been suggested that “functionalselectivity” is the most suitable term to refer to this concept. [71] 5-HT 2A receptors coupled to heterotrimeric GTP binding pro-teins regulate a variety of cell responses (Figure 1). The 5-HT 2A receptor activates phospholipase C (PLC) and phospholipaseA 2 (PLA 2 ), and is involved in various other signaling cas-cades. [77–80] PLC- b is activated by the 5-HT 2A receptor mainlythrough coupling with G a q/11 , resulting in the release of inosi-tol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP 3 ) and 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG)through lipid hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphos-phate (PIP 2 ). [81,82] IP 3 is responsible for Ca 2 + release from intra-cellular stores, whereas DAG is involved in protein kinase C(PKC) activation. [83–86] Conversion of DAG to endocannabinoid2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) by DAG lipase (DGL) [87,88] isknown to occur following 5-HT 2A receptor activation in NIH 3T3cells, [89] adding another level of complexity. 1300  2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA, Weinheim ChemMedChem 2008  , 3, 1299–1309 MED A. R. Blaazer, P. Smid, and C. G. Kruse  The 5-HT 2A receptor is responsible for PLA 2 activation andsubsequent arachidonic acid (AA) release through two parallelsignaling cascades. [90,91] The Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling path-way is activated through G a i/o , leading to phosphorylation of cPLA 2 by ERK1,2. The other cascade involves a G a 12/13 -RhoA-p38 pathway, which results in p38 mitogen-activated proteinkinase (MAPK)-mediated phosphorylation of PLA 2 . [91] The 5-HT 2A receptor can also couple with monomeric G-protein ADP-ribo-sylation factors (ARF) resulting in phospholipase D (PLD) activi-ty. [92] Rho proteins (e.g. RhoA) are involved in PLD activationalso, in which PKC may function as a modulator. [93] PLD promo-tion, notably through ARF1, leads to hydrolysis of phosphati-dylcholine (PC) to yield phosphatidic acid (PA) and choline. [94,95] PA is involved in regulation of numerous downstream cellularprocesses.As a consequence of the acute pharmacological responses just described, 5-HT 2A receptor activation results in alteredgene expression. Activation of 5-HT 2 receptors by known ago-nist DOI ( 17 ) has been found to induce expression of immedi-ate early genes c-fos , ngf1c , tis1 and arc in various rat brain re-gions, whereas antagonists were able to block the expressionpatterns. [96–98] The expression of Fos in the rat cortex elicitedby DOI is mediated through 5-HT 2A receptors; treatment with aselective 5-HT 2A antagonist completely blocked the responsewhile treatment with a 5-HT 2C antagonist did not influence ex-pression levels. [99] The genomic response to LSD ( 3 ), a halluci-nogenic ergoline with a broad pharmacological profile, [100,101] has also been studied. [102,103] More recent work reported theuse of transcriptome fingerprints elicited by 5-HT 2A ligands as atool to distinguish between hallucinogenic and non-hallucino-genic agonist effects; results indicated that c-fos expressionwas a response to general 5-HT 2A receptor activation, while in-duction of  erg-1 , erg-2 and period-1 resulted from activation bybehaviorally active agonists. [104] This is hypothesized to resultfrom the ability of ligands to differentially regulate intracellularsignaling pathways. [105] Pharmacological Methods The effects of structural modifications to ligands can be evalu-ated by several pharmacological methods, of which binding af-finity studies and functional assays are most relevant for theSAR of 5-HT 2A receptors. Binding affinities can be determinedby radioligand competition assays using rat brain homogenateor cloned human receptors. [106] Several antagonist and agonistradioligands, with known binding properties, are available forcompetition assays at the 5-HT 2A receptor. [107–109] Agonists andantagonists display different affinities for various receptorstates, [110] an observation accounted for by receptor theo-ries. [70,111–113] Functional assays measure the physiological response elicit-ed by a drug in target cells or tissues. [114] Efficacy can be de-fined as the extent to which a ligand causes the receptor tochange its behavior towards the cell. [74] Several functional re-sponses can be used to study the activation of 5-HT 2 receptorsin isolated tissue. [28] Historically, smooth muscle contraction inisolated vasculature was used as a model for receptor activa-tion. Recent studies have used intracellular signals from down- Figure 1. Graphical representation of the known 5-HT 2A signaling pathways. The 5-HT 2A receptor couples to various downstream effectors enabling diversecellular responses following receptor activation. Some of the mediating proteins (MP) are omitted for clarity. Mediating proteins (MP1) in the G a 12/13 -RhoA-p38 pathway most probably are PKN, MEKK, MKK3/6 and MKK4. [89] Shc, Grb2 and SOS are the proteins mediating (MP2) the Ras-Raf-MEK1,2-ERK1,2 pathway.Receptor regulatory pathways (e.g. phosphorylation; internalization; desensitization) following agonist activation, are not shown. Note: the localization of pro-teins and messengers in this Figure does not represent their localization in a functional cell. ChemMedChem 2008  , 3, 1299–1309  2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1301 Phenylalkylamines as 5-HT  2A Receptor Agonists  stream pathways, such as those described above, to measurereceptor activation. [71] In vivo 5-HT-targeting drug evaluation has largely been car-ried out in rodents, where 5-HT mimetics cause a state of be-havioral excitation, described as serotonin syndrome. [28] Thebehavioral effects of phenylalkylamines have been investigatedin drug discrimination (DD) studies. [115] Rats are trained to dis-criminate between injections of the training drug and saline ina two-lever DD task. [116] Substitution of the training drug, orstimulus generalization, suggests that a drug with effects simi-lar to the training drug has been administered. [61] The potencyof a drug, and the effective dose (ED) can also be establishedin this paradigm. Drug-elicited behaviors, such as the head-twitch response, are studied as well. [115] A fair number of phe-nylalkylamines have been examined in humans, and dosagedata is available. [117] Numerous factors unrelated to the studyof receptor-ligand interactions can influence the in vivo effectsof a drug, hence the direct comparison of receptor bindingdata with in vivo data is tentative. Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Molecular Mod-eling Site-directed mutagenesis studies have been carried out toidentify the structural requirements for interactions in ligand–receptor complexes, [118] and these studies have been reviewedin depth. [62,82,119] Briefly, a protonated amine moiety is believedto anchor the ligand in the transmembrane helix 3 (TMH3)domain through an ionic interaction with the carboxylategroup of Asp155 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.32). [120] Phe340 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (6.52) is essential for agonistbinding and recognition. It is involved in stabilizing the aro-matic ring of ligands, and mutations at this residue cause adramatic decrease in agonist affinity and efficacy. [121–123] Posi-tions 5.42, 5.43, and 5.46 of transmembrane helix 5 (TMH5)play important roles in ligand recognition and specificity. [118] The Ser159 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.36) residue interacts with the ligand through hy-drogen bonding; this interaction may account for the differingfunctional effects of structurally similar indolealkylamines. [124] Other serine residues have been found to influence agonistbinding as well. [125–127] Three-dimensional templates based on a bacteriorhodopsinmodel were able to explain some of the results from mutagen-esis studies. [62,128,129] Comparative molecular modeling of ligand–GPCR interactions was greatly facilitated by the elucida-tion of the bovine rhodopsin crystal structure, [130] and subse-quent refinements. [131–133] The key role of Asp155 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.32) as a ter-minal amine anchor is in agreement with previous mutagene-sis data. [134] Molecular modeling of the 5-HT 2A receptor, togeth-er with detailed site-directed mutagenesis studies, suggests ahydrophobic binding pocket surrounding the ligand, with aro-matic residues Trp151 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.28), Phe243 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.47), Phe244 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.48),Trp336 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (6.48), Phe339 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (6.51), Phe340 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (6.52), Trp367 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (7.40), andTyr370 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (7.43). [135,136] Polar moieties within agonists may interactwith Ser159 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.36), Thr160 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.37), Ser239 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.43), Ser242 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.46),and Asn343 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (6.55) from the 5-HT 2A binding site. [124,137] Dockingstudies using a human 5-HT 2A receptor homology-basedmodel, created from an in silico activated bovine rhodopsincrystal structure, confirmed these interactions. [137] Different binding orientations of DOM ( 15 ) and 5-HT ( 1 )have been suggested using a rat 5-HT 2A receptor model basedon the frog rhodopsin projection map. [135] The molecular mech-anism of partial agonism and the relative efficacy of 5-HT 2A re-ceptor ligands are determined by the ligand interaction withSer159 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3.36) and Ser242 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.46). [138] It was concluded that spe-cific interactions in TMH3 and TMH5 are responsible for thevarying degrees of receptor activation. Recently, Ser239 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.43)was shown to be more critical for agonist binding and functionthan Ser242 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.46) within TMH5. [139] The oxygen atom at the 5-position of phenylalkylamines forms a hydrogen bond withSer239 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.43). Ser242 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (5.46) is believed to act as a hydrogenbond acceptor, interacting with N  (1)H of the indole ring in in-dolealkylamines, but not phenylalkylamines. Classic Phenylalkylamines Phenylalkylamines 4 – 24 were used in the early SAR studies. Re-search focused on the nature of substituent X, para to the al-kylamine side chain. In the case of 3,4,5-substituted phenethyl-amine, escaline ( 5 ) is 5–8 times more potent in humans thanmescaline ( 4 ). [140] [ 125 I]DOI ( 17 ) radioligand competition studiesusing cloned human 5-HT 2A receptors further confirm this find-ing; the affinity of  5 ( K  i = 216 n m ) exceeded the affinity of  4 ( K  i = 551 n m ) for 5-HT 2A receptors. [141] It has been noted thathomologation beyond n -propoxy leads to diminished halluci-nogenic activity of this series in humans. [142] Replacing thealkoxy substituents at the 4-position with alkylthio substituentsleads to a further increase in potency. The potency of 4-thio-mescaline ( 6 ) is an order of magnitude greater than the parentcompound 4 , and 4-thioescaline ( 7 ) is three times more potentthan 5 . [142,143] The same pattern is seen in 2,4,5-substituted phenethyla-mines. For example, replacement of the 4-methoxy group inTMPEA ( 8 ) by a 4-methylthio group (2C-T, 9 ) leads to a large in-crease in potency in humans. [117] Halogen and alkyl para -substi-tuted phenethylamines, including 2C-D ( 10 ), 2C-B ( 11 ) and 2C-I( 12 ), are generally the most potent compounds of thisseries. [117,144,145] Homologation of the 4-alkyl group of 2C-D ( 10 )results in more potent agents such as the 4-ethyl ( 13 , 2C-E),and 4- n -propyl ( 14 , 2C-P) analogues. [145] a -Methylation of the phenethylamines to their correspond-ing phenylisopropylamines leads to the most potent com-pounds, such as DOM ( 15 ), DOB ( 16 ), and DOI ( 17 ). [146–148] A sig-nificant increase in potency was observed from compound 10 (ED 50 = 5.6 m  molkg À 1 ) to ( Æ )- 15 (ED 50 = 1.8 m  molkg À 1 ) in DDstudies, [149] and in human clinical studies. [117,144] However, an af-finity study using rat brain [ 3 H]ketanserin labeled 5-HT 2 sitesshowed that the affinity of compound 10 ( K  i = 110 n m ) is ap-proximately equal to the affinity of its phenylisopropylamineanalogue ( Æ )- 15 ( K  i = 100 n m ). [150] Similarly, the binding affinityof compound 18 (DOTFM, K  i = 1.5 n m ) was close to that of itsphenethylamine congener ( K  i = 1.1 n m ). [151] A number of hy-potheses account for the discrepancy between the binding af-finities and in vivo potency of these compounds. The a -methyl 1302  2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA, Weinheim ChemMedChem 2008  , 3, 1299–1309 MED A. R. Blaazer, P. Smid, and C. G. Kruse
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks