Response of the Association Française des Professionnels des Titres AFTI - PDF

Paris, 19 September 2008 Response of the Association Française des Professionnels des Titres AFTI to the Formal request for technical advice on identification of regulatory arrangements for post-trading

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 6
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.


Publish on:

Views: 64 | Pages: 6

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Paris, 19 September 2008 Response of the Association Française des Professionnels des Titres AFTI to the Formal request for technical advice on identification of regulatory arrangements for post-trading infrastructures and to advise on possible solutions in terms of bridging any potential differences in these arrangements Reply to be sent by Deadline for sending in responses: 19 September 2008 1 PRELIMINARY REMARKS The AFTI (Association Française des Professionnels des Titres) representatives have analysed the document in order to provide to CESR with the view of users on this particular topic. AFTI has over 600 members, all players in the securities market and back office: banks, investment firms, market infrastructures, issuers, and aims to promote and represent their trades on the Paris marketplace and across the European Union. THE TRADES OF AFTI MEMBERS Negociation platform Clearing house Market back-offices R/L system (Securities and cash) ESES Issuers services Nominative, TPI Stock-options Direct shareholdings Capital trust Securities transaction accounts Tax UCITS depositary UCITS administrator UCITS distribution Transfer agent Related trades : Tax, legal, IT, organisation management, data supply 5 The institutions that are members of the AFTI are listed in the appendix. AFTI is grateful to CESR for the opportunity to express its views, as this subject of possible post-trading infrastructures arrangements is of importance for the securities business. AFTI understands that the focus of this consultation is to assess what are the impediments (if any) jeopardizing interoperability between the post trading infrastructures, and, actual implementation of additional links between these infrastructures. AFTI has not been through the mapping exercise, impossible to realise in such a short time frame. Therefore, this contribution is focused on the main principles that AFTI deems necessary to recognize and implement in the area of post-trading, rather than qualifying a specific national environment or a particular potential link. 2 OUR KEY MESSAGES Whether interoperability is envisaged between Central Counterparties (CCPs) or Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) responds to different needs and raises different issues. As a professional association of users, we perceive that interoperability between CCPs should be looked at and valued with special care due to impacts on risk management leading potentially to systemic risks. The very purpose of a CCP is to enhance business safety through the concentration of all operations on a given range of products and mechanisms of protection to the clearing members. Therefore AFTI puts in the first place risk and safety issues for the users. AFTI pays a particular attention and warns against any intentional or unintentional move to transform the risk approach putting it on the hedge of competition in the absence of cross-border harmonisation. This may be the outcome of promoting interoperability between CCPs not currently offering the same level of clearing services and the same level of protection. From a user s perspective, competing CCPs for the same products, will lead to a fragmentation of the liquidity and unavoidable arbitraging behaviours between diverging safety mechanisms and therefore potential differences in protection levels. The objective of the interoperability provision of the Code of conduct is to introduce competition among markets infrastructures and reduction of prices. As users we strongly urge that competition and reduction of prices should be on operational productivity and not at the expense of high standards of risk management and overall level protection of the market and its participants. From an AFTI s perspective, interoperability between CCPs, is to be viewed, not as an objective per se but as an intermediary step on the way to European CCP consolidation. In other words, AFTI preferred target model is a single European CCP (or several European CCPs in the case of a product segmentation), rather than the existence of several CCPs competing for the same product ranges and exchanging information through bilateral links. As per the interim period, when interoperability between CCPs may be in place, the main concern is that lower degrees of protection compete for the same markets and those economic drivers lead to riskier models for CCPs. This worst case scenario is certainly not acceptable for the users and the financial system, CCPs being at the very heart of financial flows of the most secure currency (central bank money). This is the reason why AFTI, given the current regulatory situation for CCPs which is very different across Member States, strongly advocates for a comprehensive study on relative levels of protection provided by the various CCP given their model and regulation. AFTI does not favour inter CCP links before this issue is solved in a satisfactory manner for both the users and the regulators. In the absence of harmonisation, a CCP link should have no impact the degree of protection for users and should not be detrimental to the financial stability. In addition users are also concerned by the very large number of links being requested. It is certain that most of those requests do not have any economical justification. AFTI members like the other European associations do not support the implementation of a spaghetti model and want to ensure that a strong business case validated by the users has been established before any investment for a given link is launched. As far as CSDs are concerned, AFTI shares the view that interoperability between CSDs is useful. For the time being, however, CSDs use and communicate with different formats of messages and there settlement processes are also different. As a result, interoperability on a wider scale for European CSDs will result to be very costly for the market. Going forward, Target 2 Securities (T2S) have a clear and positive impact on connectivity for settlement as CSDs will use a common communication protocol to interact with T2S. AFTI members therefore strongly recommend avoiding implementation of links between CSDs that would overlap with the benefits delivered by Target 2 Securities project. In conclusion, AFTI shares the view of other European Institutions (French banking association, LIBA...) in favour of consolidated, efficient and safe European infrastructures. AFTI is of the opinion that CESR technical advice may be a valuable element is order to enrich the debate and help this objective to come to light. AFTI looks forward to working with CESR and the wider community to develop efficient and reasonable solutions that would ensure a high level of protection for the market while avoiding duplication of costs across the various initiatives. The next concrete step towards making progress would be for CESR to disclose its mapping exercise. -ooooo- Appendix : List of AFTI members ABN AMRO - Succursale de Paris AILANCY AIR LIQUIDE ALFI ARLIS - Groupe Lagardère ASSOCIATION DES MARCHES FINANCIERS ASSOCIATION NATIONALE DES SOCIETES PAR ACTION AUDISOFT CONSULTANTS AXA INVESTMENT MANAGERS PARIS BANQUE AGF BANQUE DE FINANCEMENT ET DE TRESORERIE BANQUE DE FRANCE BANQUE FINAMA BANQUE MARTIN MAUREL BANQUE PALATINE BANQUE ROBECO BARCLAYS BANK BEARINGPOINT BNP PARIBAS BNP PARIBAS ASSURANCE BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES SERVICES BRED BANQUE POPULAIRE BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN CACEIS CAISSE CENTRALE DE REESCOMPTE CAPGEMINI CITIBANK INTERNATIONAL PLC CLEARSTREAM BANKING CNCE COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE DU CREDIT MUTUEL COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE Ed. de ROTHSCHILD BANQUE CORTAL CONSORS CREDIT AGRICOLE CHEUVREUX CREDIT AGRICOLE TITRES CREDIT DU NORD CREDIT FONCIER CREDIT MUTUEL - CIC SECURITIES CREDIT MUTUEL CIC GIE CM-CIC-TITRES CREDIT SUISSE (France) CSC COMPUTEUR SCIENCES Corporation DELOITTE DEUTSCHE - BANK AG DIFCAM DUBUS S.A. EQUINOX CONSULTING EUROCLEAR France EUROGROUP EUROPEAN BANKING CONSULTING EXANE FINANCIERE MEESCHAERT FININFO S.A. FIRST FINANCE FORTIS BANQUE FRANCE FORTIS BROKERAGE CLEARING & CUSTODY FORTIS INVESTMENT FINANCE GIDE LOYRETTE NOUEL GROUPE LYAUTEY CONSULTING HIRAM FINANCE HSBC France / HSBC BANK PLC INEUM CONSULTING LA BANQUE POSTALE LAZARD FRERES BANQUE LCH.CLEARNET SA LCL - LE CREDIT LYONNAIS LEGAL & GENERAL BANK (FRANCE) MICHELIN Cie Générale des Etablissements MORGAN STANLEY et Co International plc NATIXIS NATIXIS EUROTITRES NEXTRAINING NYSE EURONEXT NYSE EURONEXT TECHNOLOGY SAS OFFICE DE COORDINATION BANCAIRE ET FINANCIERE ODDO & Cie OSEO FINANCEMENT OTC CONSEIL PORTZAMPARC Société de Bourse PRICE WATERHOUSECOOPER AUDIT PROCAPITAL S.A. RBC DEXIA INVESTOR SERVICES BANK - France SILTEA SOCIETE GENERALE SOLVING France STATE STREET BANQUE S.A. SWIFT FRANCE S.A.S. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON UBS SECURITIES France SA UNIVERSITE LYON 2 LUMIERE -UFR DE SCIENCES ECONOMIQUE ET DE GESTION FINANCIERE, UNIVERSITE DE DROIT JEAN MONNET, UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 - PANTHÉON SORBONNE, UNIVERSITE PARIS X NANTERRE UFR DE SCIENCES ECONOMIQUES, GESTION, MATHEMATIQUES, INFORMATIQUE, UNIVERSITE PARIS SUD ORSAY, VBF CONSULTING VERMEG XIONEO CONSULTING
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks