ARISTOTLE: ON VIRTUE EDUCATION Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı 14, 2013, Sayfa Talip KABADAYI* Abstract As Aristotle has it, the activities of man are of three kinds:

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 8
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.

Math & Engineering

Publish on:

Views: 23 | Pages: 8

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

ARISTOTLE: ON VIRTUE EDUCATION Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı 14, 2013, Sayfa Talip KABADAYI* Abstract As Aristotle has it, the activities of man are of three kinds: theoretical (seeking knowledge), practical (regulating conduct) and productive (making things). The second, the practical, type of activity is in the field of ethics. The ethics of Aristotle shows that, as the realm of Nature as a whole seems to be drawn toward some ideal, human beings also are drawn toward a highest end for man. What he is drawn is his highest well-being, the perfection of his nature or realization of his possibilities, eudaemonia or happiness. This is the supreme good, which is aimed at in all virtuous living. It is attained by the rule of reason in life and reason counsels moderation in all things. Each spesific virtue is a mean between two extremes, as courage is a mean between cowardice and foolhardiness. At this point, human beings are responsible beings to the extent that they can make choices and regulate their lives. Especially they must have a rational attitude toward pleasures, choosing the best and keeping them in their proper place. In this context, Aristotle gives a fascinating discussion about friendship that is necessary for our life. Friendship is also a kind of soul activities expressing virtue. So Aristotle s ethics were basically naturalistic: human good is defined by human nature. Aristotle sought the define the good for humans in terms of what the human organism in fact naturally seeks, namely, happiness. Hence, this paper is interested in Aristotle s philosophy of education which is based on largely on his ethical ideas as well as virtue. Key Words: Ethics, Virtue, Happiness, Reason, Friendship, Choice, Education. ARİSTOTELES TE ERDEM EĞİTİMİ Özet Aristoteles e göre, insanın üç tür etkinliği vardır: teorik (bilgi arayan), pratik (davranış düzenleyen) ve üretici (ürün ortaya koyan). Bunlardan ikincisi olan pratik etkinlik etik alanındadır. Aristoteles etiği bir bütün olarak Doğa alanının bir ideale doğru gidiyor göründüğünü; insanların da insan için en yüksek bir ereğe doğru gittiğine işaret ediyor. İnsanın yöneldiği şey onun için nihai iyi, doğasının mükemmelliği, olanaklarının gerçekleşmesi, eudaemonia ya da mutluluktur. Bu tüm erdemli yaşamda amaçlanan en yüce iyidir. Buna aklın yaşamda egemen kılınmasıyla erişilir ve akıl tüm her şeyde orta olanı öğütler. Her spesifik erdem iki aşırılık arasındaki orta olandır; buna göre, cesaret korkaklık ve çılgınlık arasında bir orta olandır. Bu noktada, insanların sorumlu varlıklar olduğu; seçimler yapmak ve yaşamlarını düzenlemeleri gerektiği olgusu önem kazanır. İnsanlar özellikle hazlar konusunda rasyonel bir tutum sergilemeli ve en iyi olanları seçerek onları kendilerine uygun bir yerde tutmalıdır. Bu bağlamda, Aristoteles yaşam için vazgeçilmez olan dostluk üzerine muhteşem bir tartışma başlatır. Dostluk da ruhun bir tür etkinliğidir ve erdemi işaret eder. İmdi, Aristoteles etiği temelde doğalcıdır; buna göre, insani iyi insan doğası tarafından belirlenip tanımlanır. Aristoteles insanlar için iyi olanı tanımlarken insanın gerçekte doğal olarak aradığı şeyin mutluluk olduğu kabulünden yola çıkar. İşte bu çalışma, Aristoteles in eğitim felsefesini serimleme işine girme çabasıdır zira onun eğitim görüşü büyük ölçüde onun etik ilkeler ve erdem anlayışına dayanmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Etik, Erdem, Mutluluk, Akıl,Tercih, Dostluk, Eğitim. * Doç. Dr., Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü, AYDIN e-posta: T. Kabadayı Introduction Aristotle ( B.C.) systematized all that was then known and he extended the limits of knowledge in virtually every existing subject, including biology, psychology, zoology, physics and astronomy as well as in those areas that today are deemed the province of philosophy, including ethics, politics, aesthetics and logic. His work was of enormous and lasting significance. Aristotle was born in Stagira, a Greek colony along the Macedonia coast. His father was the physician of the King of Macedonia, Amyntas II. When he was eighteen, Aristotle went to Athens where he studied under Plato at Plato s Academy for some twenty years. In 342, Aristotle was hired by Philip of Macedonia to tutor his son, Alexander, who was thirteen at the time. Whatever Alexander learned from Aristotle he repaid by sending Aristotle zoological specimens from his many travels and by funding his studies. In 335, Aristotle formed his own school at the Lyceum in Athens. Because of his practice of lecturing in the Lyceum s walking place or peripatos, Aristotle s follower s became known as the peripatetics, the walkers. Aristotle emphasized the importance of direct observation of nature and believed that you must obtain factual data before you can begin to theorize. He also maintained that knowledge of things requires description, classification and causal explanation. This is, of course, the modern scientific view, though Aristotle emphasized a different aspect of causation from that stressed in modern science. Aristotle s works are often classsified under five headings: the Organum, which consisted of six treatises on logic; the Rhetoric and the Poetics; his works on natural science, including most importantly the Physics and De Anima (on the soul); Metaphsics and the works on ethics and politics, which include the Nicomachean Ethics and Politics (Moore and Bruder, 1993: 43). In Aristotle s point of view, our principle or highest objective by nature is the attainment of happiness; for it is that alone that we seek for its own sake. And, because the attainment of happinessis naturally our highest objective, it follows that happiness is our highest good. In what does happiness, our highest good, consist, according to Aristotle? To answer, we must consider man s function, he said. To discover what goodnes is for an axe or anything whatsoever, we must take into consideration its function, what it actually does. And when we consider what the human does as a human, we see that most essentially, s/he (a) lives and (b) reasons. Thus, happiness consists of two things, Aristotle concluded: enjoyment and the exercise and development of the capacity to reason. It consists in part of enjoyment because the human being, as a living thing, has biological needs and impulses the satisfaction of which is pleasurable. And it consists in part of developing and exercising the capacity to reason, because only the human being, as distinct from other living things, has that capacity. Because this capacity differentiates humans from other living things, its exercise is stressed by Aristotle as the most important component of happiness. Pleasure alone does not constitute happiness, he insists (Moore and Bruder, 1993: 175). The exercise of our unique and distinctive capacity to reason is termed by Aristotle virtue; thus Aristotle s famous phrase that happiness is activity in accordance with virtue. There are two different kinds of virtues. To exercise actively our reasoning abilities, as when we study nature or cogitate about something, is to be intellectually virtuous. But we also exercise our rational capacity by moderating our impulses and appetites, and when we do this, we are said by Aristotle to be morally virtuous. The largest part of Aristotle s major ethical work, the Nicomachean Ethics, is devoted to analysis of spesific moral virtues, which Aristotle held to be the mean between extremes; for instance, courage is the mean between fearing everything and fearing nothing. He emphasized as well that virtue is a matter of habit: just as an axe that is only occasionally sharp does not fulfill its function well, the human who exercises his rational capacities only occasionally does not fulfill his function, that is, is not virtuous (Moore and Bruder, 1993: 176). So Aristotle s philosophy of education in which this paper is interested is based mostly on his ethical ideas. He thought that men needed to understand the relationship that existed between contact and pleasure and how to take pleasure in noble acts. Man who has a rational soul has the potential to become either good or bad. 78 Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Number 14, 2013 Aristotle: On Virtue Education Aristotle believed in a free will and felt that a good educational program could introduce the desire in men to act for the good and to follow the moderate path in all cases. Aristotle advocated education to be controlled by the state and sensed that the primary aim of education is to make people virtuous and he advocates training of the body as well as training in literature, music and gymnastics. Underlying every successful educational program there must be a philosophy of education. We are not always aware that it is there and many educational programs are planned without a philosophy in mind. However, if our educational ideas are to work, they must be based on something solid, a foundation and this foundation is our philosophy of education. Hence, Aristotle s philosophy of education has many things to offer us to develop and progress our system of education as well as solving our educational problems. Without an understanding of educational philosophy, it strikes me that, any attempt to improve education would be meaningless and futile. We would simply be reformulating old errors and outdated beliefs. Adequate knowledge of the history of educational ideas is the only safe assurance that we will not repeat past mistakes and build our educational policies on shifting or quick sands. According to Aristotle, every art or applied science and every systematic investigation and similarly every action and choice seem to aim at some good; the good, therefore, has been well defined as that at which all things aim (Aristotle 2011: 378). Since all knowledge and every choice is directed toward some good, as far as its name is concerned, people call it happines; namely, being happy is the same as living well and doing well (Aristotle, 1962: 3-7). Hence, human beings have a nature, i.e., an end or telos. The natural end of human beings is eudaimonia (flourishing, well-being, or happiness). Eudaimonia is the activity of the soul according to reason, i.e., activity in accordance with the most perfect or complete virtue or excellence and it includes goods of the soul (virtue), goods of the body (health), and external goods (friendship, wealth, liberty) (Aristotle, 2011: ). * Aristotle s conceptions of eudaimonia and virtue depend heavily on his conception of the human soul. The human soul for Aristotle consists of irrational and rational parts (Aristotle 1941: ). The irrational and rational parts of the soul each appear to be further subdivided into two parts. The two irrational parts of the soul are I) the vegetative faculty and II) the appetitive faculty and in general the desiring faculty. The rational part in turn appears to be two-fold: 1) the rational faculty, which has reason in the strict sense, with authority and in itself, and 2) the other, apparently the desiring faculty insofar as it obeys reason (Aristotle 2011: ). The rational faculty is itself further subdivided into two parts with distinctive functions: i) the scientific part, by which we contemplate the kind of things whose principles cannot be otherwise (the necessary), and ii) the deliberative or calculative part, by which we contemplate variable things (the contingent) (Aristotle, 2011: ) and reason about means and ends. As seen above, for Aristotle, the end or the highest good of man is happiness or Eudaimonia, a flourishing life. Now, what are the features of the highest good: 1. It is pursued for its own sake. 2. Other things are pursued for the sake of it. 3. It is not pursued for the sake of anything else. The best good should be complete, self sufficient and the most choice-worthy. Aristotle s discussion of common beliefs about the highest good or happiness goes as follows: So many things you can say here; no stress, self-satisfaction, something subjective, a state of mind, something as states of consciousness. For Aristotle, happiness is a whole state of one s life and objective. He examines several candidates for happiness according to common beliefs: 1. Pleasure (something makes you feel great) 2. Honor (a life of cultivated people, conceiving the good as honor) 3. Virtue (people are good in doing things and help others) Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 14, T. Kabadayı What makes a pen as a good pen? It writes well. What is the function (purpose) of a knife? Cutting. What is the function of a carpenter? What is peculiar to us? We, as living things, share something with plants (a life of nutrition and growth). Also, we share a life of sense perception with other animals. But what is special in us? Reason! According to Aristotle, only reason is special for human beings. The soul s activity is the good with the use of reason (Aristotle, 2011: ). Happines is the best of all things but we must attain it by our own efforts. There are several things as options of the source of happiness: learning, discipline, reason, chance or something else, which one is the most important for man to get happiness? Aristotle goes on to say that happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul expressing virtue, hence not a product of fortune. So happiness depends on virtue, not on fortune or by chance. But fortune still affects happiness. As Aristotle has it, man is the only animal that can make rational judgments and hence it is in this unique capacity that his/her goodness is found. The ability to reason really matters in one s good life. Aristotle focuses on moral virtue, a virtue of character. The first question is how to produce moral virtue? To Aristotle, there are three ways here: nature, teaching/ education and habituation through doing them. So the answer is that moral virtue is a result of habit. We learn to be good by doing something good. Learning is actually by doing or building good habit. Now, virtue is acquired through our good habit rather than a good fortune. It is up to you if you can become a good person. It is within your power. Virtue is a state (not a feeling or capacity but state) that decides; a state consists in a mean. How can we reach the mean? Aristotle puts forward that it is going to take practical wisdom (phronesis) to figure out the right thing to do and this is a life long practice. It is worth mentioning that you also need a social life associated with good people to make right decision by using for reason for good (Weston, 2011: 77-79). Thus, Aristotle distinguishes between intellectual and ethical virtues. The intellectual virtues are excellences of thought whereas the ethical virtues are excellences of character expressed in action. Each of the parts of the rational faculty -the scientific and deliberativehas its own distinctive set of intellectual virtues. The key intellectual virtues for our purposes are sophia -contemplative wisdomand phronēsis -practical wisdom or prudence. Sophia belongs to the scientific part of the rational faculty and involves excellence in apprehending true first principles and true conclusions drawn from them. Aristotle defines phronēsis, which belongs to the deliberative part of the rational faculty, as a state [of the soul] involving truth and reason concerned with action regarding things that are good and bad for a human being (Aristotle, 2011: 415). The ethical virtues belong to the second rational subdivision of the soul, the desiring part insofar as it obeys reason. An ethical virtue is an activity of the soul that makes a man good, enabling him to perform his function well, and is a constitutive part of eudaimonia. An ethical virtue is a right action, a mean between extremes of excess and deficiency in specific contexts. Aristotle argues that practical wisdom is inseparable from the ethical virtues: It is clear, then, from what has been said, that it is not possible to be good in the strict sense without practical wisdom, nor practically wise without moral excellence (Aristotle, 2011: 423). Aristotle thus implies the unity of virtue, for the presence of practical wisdom entails the presence of all the ethical virtues. At this point, for Aristotle, eudaimonia and virtue require voluntariness and choice. Voluntary actions are those of which the moving principle is in the agent himself, he being aware of the particular circumstances of the action. Involuntary actions, on the other hand, are those done under compulsion or by reason of ignorance, but actions done by reason of anger [a passion] or appetite are not rightly called involuntary (Aristotle, 2011: 403). After this definition of voluntary and involuntary, Aristotle discusses choice which seems to be very closely related to virtue. Aristotle uses the term choice more narrowly than it seems to be used today. Choice is not simply reducible to voluntary action. Other animals and children share in voluntary action, but not in choice (Aristotle, 2011: 403). Choice is related to wish and yet it is different, because one can wish for the impossible or for something not in one s power but one cannot choose the impossible or something beyond one s power (Aristotle, 80 Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Number 14, 2013 Aristotle: On Virtue Education 2011: 404). As Aristotle has it, wish is of the end, choice of the means: for example, we wish to be healthy, but we choose the acts which will make us healthy, and we wish to be happy and say we do, but we cannot well say we choose to be so; for, in general, choice seems to relate to the things that are in our power (Aristotle, 2011: 404). Nor is choice simply opinion, for choice has to do with character and therefore action (Aristotle, 2011: 404). Choice follows and is the completion of deliberation: The same thing is deliberated upon and is chosen, except that the object of choice is already determinate, since it is that which has been decided upon as a result of deliberation that is the object of choice. In this context, the object of choice being one of the things in our own power which is desired after deliberation, choice will be deliberate desire of things in our own power; for when we have decided as a result of deliberation, we desire in accordance with our deliberation (Aristotle, 2011: 406). The object of choice, then, the means, is discovered by the deliberative part of the rational faculty but the end, the object of wish, is discovered by the scientific part. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle gives also a fascinating discussion about friendship. His view of friendship is still very attractive and worth of exploring. He goes on to say that after what we have said, a discussion of friendship would naturally follow, since it is a virtue or implies virtue, and is besides most necessary with a view to living (Aristotle, 1941: 1058). According to Aristotle s analysis; friends can be different kinds (complete; incomplete), essential elements of friendship and benefits of friendship are discussed as well. Friendship is necessary for our life; all of us love to have friends, besides we need friends in a good life. So, friendship is not only necessary but also what is fine. Friendship, which is a kind of soul activities expressing virtue, happens only among creatures with soul. As Aristotle has it, there are three necessary conditions for friendship to somebody, namely, mutual love, reciprocated good will and not mere reciprocated good will but also awareness of it. Man s soul is going to help him/her to realize the reciprocity between friends (Aristotle, 1941: 1060). Now, there are actually two kinds of friendshi
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks